Latest topics
» Post Qualification
Fri Jul 20, 2018 7:55 pm by siddecruz

» Acquisition RROW
Fri Jul 20, 2018 7:54 pm by siddecruz

» Cancellation of Notice to Proceed
Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:10 pm by Lumi

» retrieve of user ID and password
Thu Jul 12, 2018 12:45 pm by johnrayconcreteproducts

» Conduct of Post Qualification
Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:45 pm by ford15

» Can we consider the composition of the BAC as valid if one of the members refuses to perform function as BAC member?
Wed Jul 11, 2018 10:57 am by rubyrose

»  Locked PhilGEPS
Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:53 am by eumarmahal

» RE: INVITATION TO BID
Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:32 am by irishpugong

» Request for review of uploaded documents for platinum renewal
Tue Jul 10, 2018 10:27 am by zcabarios

» Platinum Membership Renewal?????
Tue Jul 10, 2018 10:23 am by zcabarios


Absence of documents submitted by the bidders

Go down

Absence of documents submitted by the bidders

Post by nympha guemo on Wed Sep 26, 2012 10:49 am

Good morning!

May i just be clarified about the ff: issues:

1. A bidder failed to include a document in the 1st envelope ( technical ) , labelled original but the same document found in the copy 1 envelope. Shall we consider it FAILED or PASSED ?

2. A bidder submitted only 1 cd instead of 2 ( added requirement by the procuring entity in the Financial component containing the bill of quantities and detailed estimates). Shall we declare the bid as PASSED or FAILED ?

Thanks po.


NYMPHA D. GUEMO

nympha guemo
New Member
New Member

Female Number of posts : 2
Company/Agency : Department of Education, Division of Camarines Sur
Occupation/Designation : Asst. Schools Division Superintendent; BAC Chairman-Infrastructure
Registration date : 2012-09-26

Back to top Go down

Re: Absence of documents submitted by the bidders

Post by engrjhez® on Thu Sep 27, 2012 7:11 am

nympha guemo wrote:Good morning!

May i just be clarified about the ff: issues:

1. A bidder failed to include a document in the 1st envelope ( technical ) , labelled original but the same document found in the copy 1 envelope. Shall we consider it FAILED or PASSED ?

Following the non-discretionary PASS/FAIL criteria and considering that the BAC opens the original, a marking of FAIL is in order. The BAC cannot have the discretion of opening copies in separate envelopes just to check if it really present there.

nympha guemo wrote:
2. A bidder submitted only 1 cd instead of 2 ( added requirement by the procuring entity in the Financial component containing the bill of quantities and detailed estimates). Shall we declare the bid as PASSED or FAILED ?

Thanks po.


NYMPHA D. GUEMO
Technically speaking, absence or patent insufficiency of any document or requirement is tantamount to a FAIL mark. However, additional requirements are supposed to be limited by that stipulated in the ITB consistent with the IRR. In such ruling, we presume that the CD requirement is part of the Financial Requirement as stated in the bidding documents and such requirement is valid. Assailing its validity is of course another story. Smile
avatar
engrjhez®
Grand Master
Grand Master

Male Number of posts : 2485
Age : 40
Company/Agency : City Government of Bacoor [Region IV-A, Province of Cavite]
Occupation/Designation : City Administrator's Office / Certified National Trainer - PhilGEPS
Registration date : 2008-10-31

http://www.bacoor.gov.ph

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum